As the purses for the Non-Fight of the Century go through the stratosphere never mind the roof – latest projections $240million for Floyd Mayweather and $160m for Manny Pacquiao – so the scoring of Mr Money’s victory falls deeper into question.
The more pay-per-view
returns come in from around the US – currently well over four million US buys
at $99.95 a pop – the greater the certainty that we have just witnessed the
marketing miracle of The Half-Billion Dollar Fight.
One
dedicated website in America, Boxing News 24, sat its leading commentators down to
monitor the video, first at actual speed, then in slow motion, finally frame by
frame.
The task was prompted
initially by astonishment at the official fight statistics, which among other
anomalies proclaimed that Pacquiao had connected with less than 20 per cent of
his total punches and only nine per cent of his jabs.
So they decided to tally
every blow and in so doing came up with startling numbers which multiply
long-standing doubts about the validity of the punch stats, as well as concerns
about the verdict itself.
Pacquiao poses with his wife and daughter as he recovers from his shoulder injury in the Philippines
Only by
bending over backwards to give Mayweather the benefit of one statistically
equal round, by virtue of his higher work rate in those three minutes, and
another in which he landed one less punch but would have got the hometown nod
could he have achieved even so much as a draw.
Mark that
second round 10-10 and the ninth 9-10 and Pacquiao would be their clear winner.
For what
it’s worth, I caused something of a stir by scoring the fight a 115-115 draw
from my privileged vantage point at ringside.
These were the final tallies of the three official judges, all in
favour of Mayweather: Glenn Feldman 116-112. Burt Clements 116-112. Dave
Moretti 118-110. These are the website tallies, calibrated round-by-round according
to punches thrown, punches landed, the score for each round, with Mayweather’s
stats first:
The
conclusions here include:
1) The
fight was far closer than the judges, especially Moretti, and most pundits
perceived
2) Many
rounds were exceptionally difficult if not too close to call.
3) The
punch stats as counted in the heat of the night are profoundly suspect (one US
commentator who had Pacquaio winning asked if they were compiled by ‘kids from
the HBO and Showtime offices’
and was told ‘Yes.’)
4)
Pacquiao’s claim that he had won the fight was reasonable, not outrageous as
the in-ring interviewer implied.
5) If
watching on television, maybe better to mute the sound commentary.
6)
Mayweather is very wise to keep insisting on home-town advantage in Las Vegas,
which benefits from the huge economic impact of his fights.
No comments:
Post a Comment